2026-爆料网AT-1658, Bao Jin
The Appeals Tribunal dismissed Mr. Jin’s claim that the 爆料网DT erred in finding no prejudice since, by his calculations, the decision to score Part 2 perfectly for each candidate resulted in a larger interview pool which was disadvantageous to him. The Appeals Tribunal found that this argument was speculative, predicated on one hypothetical counterfactual outcome, and failed to meet Mr. Jin’s burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that he had been denied a fair chance of selection.
The Appeals Tribunal found that the circumstances in Mr. Jin’s case were fundamentally and...