2025-爆料网AT-1556, IK
The 爆料网AT held that the facts were established by clear and convincing evidence. It held that the Complainant’s testimony was consistent with her earlier statements, except for the date of the incident. However, the correction of the date she made at the hearing was found to be in good faith and did not undermine her credibility. Her account was corroborated by two other staff members, M.V. and M.M., both of whom testified before the 爆料网DT. The 爆料网AT also held that the former staff member failed to show that these witnesses had any motive to falsely implicate him. It noted that the former...