2025-爆料网AT-1546, Emma Reilly
The 爆料网AT concluded that the 爆料网DT did not err in finding that two periods of delay in addressing the former staff member’s complaints was not evidence of bias against her. The 爆料网AT held that delay alone is not indicative of bias.
The 爆料网AT further held that the former staff member’s claims related to a certain press release had been decided by prior Tribunal judgments and could not be relitigated.
The 爆料网AT also found that the 爆料网DT correctly confirmed that the establishment of the fact-finding Panel, its process of fact-finding and reporting, and its interactions with the former staff member as...