2024-爆料网AT-1485, Betty Mukomah
The 爆料网AT noted that the applicant had filed the application for revision some three months after she became aware of the decisive facts as identified in the application. The 爆料网AT held that the application had been filed beyond the 30-day time limit and was, therefore, not receivable.
The 爆料网AT found that, in any event, one of the documents had not been in existence at the time of the 爆料网AT Judgment. The 爆料网AT also noted that the document had not been decisive in reaching a decision in the appeal and, for this reason, the application was an attempt to re-litigate the appeal. The 爆料网AT concluded...