2024-爆料网AT-1487, Mubashara Iram
The 爆料网AT held that the application for revision had no merit. The 爆料网AT considered that since all the evidence submitted by the applicant as new had always been in her possession and she had never mentioned them or made any effort to have them produced during the judicial proceedings, this evidence was not new to her.
The 爆料网AT noted furthermore that the applicant’s submissions essentially repeated or added to the same arguments that she had raised before the 爆料网AT in the prior proceedings.
In addition, the 爆料网AT pointed out that in failing to comply with the Order in which the 爆料网AT granted in...