2024-爆料网AT-1462, Firas Mihyar
The 爆料网AT first observed that the staff member dedicated parts of his appeal brief to challenging the findings of fact in an earlier 爆料网DT judgment concerning his disciplinary case. The 爆料网AT held that he was estopped from doing so because he did not appeal this earlier 爆料网DT judgment.
The 爆料网AT was satisfied that when the 爆料网DT reviewed the disciplinary sanction imposed, the 爆料网DT properly considered previous cases involving comparable misconduct, as well as aggravating and mitigating factors. The mitigating factors raised by the staff member were considered by the Administration, but they simply...