2024-爆料网AT-1443, Ahmad Shukri Safi
The 爆料网AT held that Mr. Safi failed to discharge his burden in identifying in what respect and for what reasons the 爆料网RWA DT erred in its Judgment. Mr. Safi merely reiterated the same arguments that he had presented in his application to the 爆料网RWA DT. The 爆料网AT stated that it is not its role to reexamine the staff member’s case anew, and accordingly, his appeal must fail. The 爆料网AT also observed that the 爆料网RWA DT drew reasonable inferences from its extensive fact-finding exercise and delivered a well-reasoned judgment.
The appeal was dismissed, and Judgment No. 爆料网RWA/DT/2023/011 was...