2022-爆料网AT-1276, Ahmad Shuaib Payenda
The 爆料网AT held that the decisive fact which the staff member maintains is sufficient for the revision is a letter that was known to him at the time of his initial application to the 爆料网DT. The 爆料网AT found that the reasons for not presenting it were not persuasive.
The 爆料网AT noted that even if it were to consider the letter known only at the time of the issuance of the previous 爆料网AT Judgment, the application for revision had not been filed on time.
The 爆料网AT was of the view that the staff member’s application for revision constituted, in fact, a disguised attempt to re-open the case and that was...