2022-爆料网AT-1270, Moayyad Naeem Dahoud
The 爆料网AT considered an appeal by Mr. Dahoud.
The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA DT correctly found that the disability benefit paid to Mr. Dahoud in accordance with Area Staff Rule 109.7(1) was different from the termination indemnity paid to certain staff members in accordance with Area Staff Rule 109.9.
The 爆料网AT found that despite the Medical Board's conclusion that he had an 8 per cent permanent impairment, this does not necessarily lead to a finding of permanent and total disability, as required by Area Staff Rule 109.7(7), so as to receive the supplemental benefit. Nor does this medical...