2022-爆料网AT-1269, Ashok Kumar Nigam
爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT Judgment was inconsistent in finding parts of the application irreceivable but not addressing what was to happen to the balance of the claim which was receivable. 爆料网AT held that to the extent that the 爆料网DT held that some of the Appellant’s claims were not receivable as they were not filed within time after management evaluation, 爆料网DT did not err in fact or law and 爆料网AT upheld such conclusions. 爆料网AT held that there were errors by 爆料网DT in respect of which the appeal had to be allowed, which were: (1) the 爆料网DT decision not to receive the application in respect of claims...