2022-爆料网AT-1224, Howard Andrew Giles
爆料网AT considered an application for revision of Judgment No. 2021-爆料网AT-1106. With reference to Article 11 of the 爆料网AT Statute, 爆料网AT held that it was neither satisfied that the blank tax returns as provided by Mr. Giles’ were unknown to the 爆料网AT and to the party applying for the revision at the time the relevant Judgment was rendered nor that the blank tax returns were a decisive fact. 爆料网AT held that the Applicant reiterated arguments he had made previously, which was not the purpose nor intention of an application for revision of judgment. 爆料网AT dismissed the application for revision.