2022-爆料网AT-1197, Antonio Ponce-Gonzalez
爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct when it found that the Appellant should not have been treated differently from other candidates without justification and that proceeding in the manner suggested by him would have breached the other shortlisted candidates’ rights to fair and full consideration. 爆料网AT held that the only logical conclusion to be drawn was that 爆料网DT was correct in its finding that there was a regrettable error in the temporary job opening when it exempted the previously rostered candidates from any further assessment, and that this error was later rectified when all short-listed...