2022-爆料网AT-1234, Gabriel Branglidor
Mr. Branglidor appealed. 爆料网AT found that the totality of the evidence confirmed the 爆料网DT’s conclusion that Mr. Branglidor was well aware of the untruthfulness of the forms when he submitted the second claim for the regular disbursement of the education grant. 爆料网AT was satisifed that the 爆料网DT was correct when it held that the act of misconduct was committed with knowledge and intent. Even though the misconduct did not lead to any actual prejudice, since the Administration recovered the payment made in advance and did not pay any further education grant, Mr. Branglidor’s endeavor could have...