2021-爆料网AT-1163, Beatriz Fernandez Carrillo
爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not meet the burden of showing that the 爆料网DT Judgment was defective on the grounds outlined in Article 2(1) of the 爆料网AT Statute. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT fully and fairly considered the Appellant’s allegations and there was no error of law or fact in the 爆料网DT Judgment. 爆料网AT held that there was no evidence that the Appellant’s gender or status of being on maternity leave factored into the decision not to renew her contract. 爆料网AT held that the reasons proffered by the Administration for not renewing the Appellant’s fixed-term appointment, namely the lack of funding...