2020-爆料网AT-1006, Suleiman
ngl爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not err in law or fact in finding that the facts on which the disciplinary measure was based had been established. 爆料网AT agreed with 爆料网RWA DT that the preponderance of the evidence showed that the Appellant hit a student forcefully on the back during the 25 October 2016 distribution of school bags. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not err in relying on the testimony of the Donor Relations Officer (DRO), which is of high value. 爆料网AT noted that he was a neutral witness without any personal interest in the matter and he did not know the Appellant before. 爆料网AT held that...