2019-爆料网AT-969, Argyrou
爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not provide evidence with sufficient particularity of any specific instances in which he had requested compensation for overtime, or the Administration had denied such a request. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT’s finding that absent any identifiable administrative decision the application was not receivable ratione materiae was correct. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s argument that his overtime work without compensation over the years was in violation of the Administration’s responsibility to establish a normal working week for its employees and was thus a continuous...