2019-爆料网AT-958, Dispert & Ho
爆料网AT considered the Appellants’ consolidated appeals against the rejection of their requests to be upgraded to a higher level. 爆料网AT held that it was not satisfied that the essential elements were present to enable the IMO SAB to take a decision within the meaning of Article 2(10) of the 爆料网AT Statute. 爆料网AT held that, even if the SAB issuance was a decision, it was nevertheless only advisory or recommendatory. 爆料网AT noted that SAB gave advice to the Secretary-General of IMO, who could not be regarded as a neutral part of the process as he was both the employer’s representative and the original...