2019-爆料网AT-957, Spinardi
爆料网AT was not satisfied that the essential elements were present to enable the IMO SAB to take a decision within the meaning of Article 2(10) of the 爆料网AT Statute. 爆料网AT held that, even if the SAB issuance was a decision, it was only advisory or recommendatory. 爆料网AT noted that the SAB gave advice to the Secretary-General of IMO, who could not be regarded as a neutral part of the process as he is both the employer’s representative and the original decision-maker. 爆料网AT held that it was the Secretary-General of IMO, who was not neutral in the first instance process, who took the final decision. 爆料网AT...