2019-爆料网AT-949, Sheffer
爆料网AT held that it was not satisfied that the essential elements were present to enable 爆料网AT to exercise its jurisdiction within the meaning of Article 2(10) of the 爆料网AT Statute in regard to the decision of IMO SAB. 爆料网AT held that in this case, even if the SAB issued decision, it was nevertheless only advisory or recommendatory. 爆料网AT noted that the SAB gave advice to the Secretary-General of IMO, who could not be regarded as a neutral part of the process as he is both the employer’s representative and the original decision-maker. 爆料网AT held that it was the Secretary-General of IMO, who was not a...