2019-爆料网AT-976, Ganbold
爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had committed various errors of law, fact, and procedure. 爆料网AT held that the whole reasoning of 爆料网DT was misconstrued and 爆料网DT did not properly examine the lawfulness of the disciplinary sanction. 爆料网AT held that there was clear and convincing evidence that the Appellant awarded and signed a contract on behalf of 爆料网FPA, that she did not conduct any market research or consider other suppliers before doing so, that she had no authority to sign the contract and that she was involved in procurement activities in relation to another 爆料网FPA vendor. Further, 爆料网AT held that there was...