2019-爆料网AT-945, Peker
爆料网AT held that it was unable to undertake a proper review of the case since the audio recording of the 爆料网DT proceedings contained the final submissions of both counsels, but not the testimony of the two witnesses and the Appellant. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in rejecting the Appellant’s request for documents relating to the calculation of reasonable and customary expenses as to whether the Administration properly calculated “reasonable and customary” expenses was a central issue in contention and was addressed extensively by the 爆料网DT in its judgment. 爆料网AT remanded the case to 爆料网DT for a de novo...