2019-爆料网AT-921, Mindua
爆料网AT held that the Appellant was not a staff member, as he was not supported by the Secretary-General in terms of Staff Regulation 4. 1 and was not subject to the Secretary-General’s authority, but rather he was elected by the General Assembly. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in dismissing the application as not receivable ratione personae. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly distinguished ILOAT judgment No. 3359, noting that the ILOAT’s jurisdiction ratione personae is broader than 爆料网DT’s jurisdiction, in that it may be invoked by “officials”, which includes judges. Noting that the current...