2018-爆料网AT-875, Kellie
爆料网AT considered the Appellant’s appeal. 爆料网AT considered the criteria set out in Article 2 of the 爆料网AT Statute to determine whether any alleged errors of law and fact resulted in a manifestly unreasonable decision. 爆料网AT found that there was no evidence that the decision to abolish the post encumbered by the Appellant was unlawful. 爆料网AT also found that 爆料网RWA DT’s decision was correctly based on the applicable law and available evidence. To that end, 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to establish that the 爆料网RWA DT committed any error, whether of law, fact, or procedure. 爆料网AT further noted that...