2018-爆料网AT-836, Loeber
爆料网AT considered the appeal. 爆料网AT found no reason to differ from 爆料网DT’s conclusion. 爆料网AT found that the applicable procedural requirements were followed, and the evidence did not supersede the presumption of regularity of the administrative decision. 爆料网AT further noted that the Appellant was afforded full and fair consideration and that he failed to establish any bias by the members of the panel. 爆料网AT also held that the Appellant forewent the required procedures for filing complaints of discrimination and failed to provide evidence that he was the target of the restructuring exercise or that it...