2017-爆料网AT-738, Bertrand
爆料网AT refused the Appellant’s application for an oral hearing. 爆料网AT held that there was nothing to support the Appellant’s submission that 爆料网DT erred in finding that he had not exercised reasonable care by expecting the same standard of care from him as from the Operations Response Unit supervisor. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s finding that the Appellant was not on duty at the relevant time was fully supported by the facts and was not in error. Contrary to the Appellant’s submission, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not suggest that the Appellant intended to cause the loss or foresaw the loss, nor did the...