2017-爆料网AT-746, Auda
爆料网AT held that the fact that the non-renewal decision was communicated verbally was, by itself, of no consequence since there is no explicit requirement in law for such notification to be in writing. 爆料网AT noted that Staff Rule 11. 2(c) does not require a written notification as a prerequisite to contest an administrative decision. 爆料网AT affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment dismissing the staff member’s application but set aside it's finding that the application was receivable.