2016-爆料网AT-685, Beidas
爆料网AT considered the Appellant’s appeal of both 爆料网RWA DT decisions. 爆料网AT noted that 爆料网RWA DT gave full consideration to the Appellant’s claim that the transfer was a disguised disciplinary measure following allegations of her corporal punishment of students. 爆料网AT noted that there was evidence that, prior to her transfer, the Chief, Field Education Programme had dismissed these allegations as unsubstantiated and it was not until almost two months after the transfer that the Jordan Field Office authorised an investigation. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT therefore correctly concluded that the Appellant’s...