2016-爆料网AT-681, Karseboom
爆料网AT considered Mr Karseboom’s application for interpretation of judgment regarding 爆料网AT’s judgment delivered on 30 October 2015, with respect to: (i) whether moral damages awarded by the 爆料网DT were still payable; and (ii) whether the Appeals Tribunal required a medical board to be convened. 爆料网AT found that Mr Karseboom failed to identify any sentences or words in the judgment that were unclear or ambiguous. 爆料网AT accordingly dismissed the application for interpretation of judgment.