2016-爆料网AT-675, Uwais
爆料网AT considered both of the Appellant’s cases in their judgment. 爆料网AT held that it was not persuaded that 爆料网RWA DT erred in deciding that the decision to close the cases arising from the Appellant’s complaints was lawful. 爆料网AT noted that 爆料网RWA DT’s decision was justified based on careful consideration of the Appellant’s arguments and evidence gathered during the investigation. However, 爆料网AT held that the characterization of the decision to terminate the Appellant’s fixed-term appointment as a disciplinary measure tainted the process to such a significant degree that it rendered the decision...