2016-爆料网AT-665, Hamdan
爆料网AT considered whether 爆料网RWA DT erred on a question of law and fact and whether its decision to dismiss the Appellant’s application was flawed by procedural irregularities. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to identify the apparent error of fact in the judgment and the basis for contending that an error was made, merely repeating arguments that did not succeed before 爆料网RWA DT. The Appellant’s decision to sign the contract was binding on him as there was no evidence of duress. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed 爆料网RWA DT’s judgment.