2016-爆料网AT-659, Liu
爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had properly reviewed the contested decision in accordance with the applicable law. 爆料网AT held that there was no error in 爆料网DT’s conclusion that the Appellant’s G-6 post, funded through government contributions, no longer exist on the 1st of August 2013, the day after the expiration of her appointment. 爆料网AT held that the reason provided for the non-extension of appointment was supported by the evidence. 爆料网AT agreed with 爆料网DT’s finding that there was no evidence provided to support the allegation that the contested decision was ill-motivated. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal the...