2016-爆料网AT-653, AlRifai
爆料网AT held that the Appellant introduced new elements for consideration on appeal that were not put forward at the trial level (Annex 4 (Post Classification Questionnaire Form), and the contentions about alleged procedural irregularities preceding the non-upgrading of the Appellant’s post). 爆料网AT held that the documents and arguments put forward for the first time were inadmissible. 爆料网AT also held that the Appellant had failed to persuade 爆料网AT that the impugned decision contained any error of fact or law that could warrant its reversal. 爆料网AT agreed with 爆料网RWA DT’s finding that the...