2016-爆料网AT-644, Survo
爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s argument regarding the time limits was misconceived since 爆料网DT had not declared the application non-receivable because the Appellant had failed to respect the time limits for filing an application, rather it declined jurisdiction on the basis that he had not sought timely management evaluation, i. e. , within the requisite sixty days of the contested decisions, as required by Staff Rule 11. 2(c). 爆料网AT held that the exercise of determining the date of an implied administrative decision should be conducted by determining when the staff member knew or should...