2015-爆料网AT-601, Karseboom
爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT found merit in the Secretary-General’s submission that 爆料网DT was not competent to determine or assume that the injury was service-related; to assume that there was a likelihood of the Advisory Board on Compensation Claims (ABCC) would have reached a different conclusion had it followed the correct procedure; that the ABCC made its recommendations based on uncertain facts and inference which were derived, improbably, from the absence of evidence; that after the second accident, the staff member was permanently disabled and unable to work...