2015-爆料网AT-546, Staedtler
爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not establish any procedural errors warranting the reversal of the judgment. 爆料网AT held that there was no evidence of any adverse administrative decision that stemmed from the Appellant’s performance appraisal and that the comments of his Second Reporting Officer (SRO) reflected no more than a legitimate exercise of administrative hierarchy evaluating employees, and did not of itself constitute an independent, administrative decision capable of being appealed. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly concluded that the Appellant’s challenge which related to the comments of...