2014-爆料网AT-494, Sutherland et al
爆料网AT considered motions seeking execution of four judgments (judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-357, judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-359, judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-358, and judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-360). 爆料网AT denied these motions, noting that execution did occur in each of the cases. 爆料网AT also noted that payment of the moral damages had been effected and a new conversion process had been completed, thus, none of the applications merited an order for execution pursuant to Article 11(4) of the 爆料网AT Statute and Article 27 of the 爆料网AT RoP. With respect to Ademagic et al. and Mr Longone’s motion to hold decision letters in...