2015-爆料网AT-519, Ivanov
爆料网AT held that the matter under investigation was closed and the Appellant had not presented any cogent argument to show that there were exceptional circumstances that might otherwise have entitled him to the investigation report. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant was not entitled to receive a detailed copy of the investigation report. 爆料网AT held that there was no evidence to support the argument that 爆料网DT erred on questions of law and fact. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.