2014-爆料网AT-492, Gakumba
爆料网AT considered Mr Gakumba’s application for revision of judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-387. 爆料网AT held that it did not fulfil the statutory requirements and was seemingly disguised as an attempt to re-open the case. 爆料网AT held that it would be manifestly unreasonable to submit that the 爆料网DP Conversion Policy issued in 2010 could not be argued by the staff member in 2012 before the 爆料网DT, or in 2013 before 爆料网AT. 爆料网AT held that no valid reason had been provided about the untimely submission of the application for revision. 爆料网AT dismissed the application for revision.