2014-爆料网AT-484, Abassa
爆料网AT considered an appeal of judgment No. 爆料网DT/2013/145. On the issue of whether 爆料网DT erred in law in not receiving the Appellant’s application for revision of judgment, 爆料网AT held that it did. 爆料网AT noted that to import into Article 12(1) of the 爆料网DT Statute the limitations presently advocated by 爆料网DT, merely because of the inclusion of the word “executable,” would be unduly restrictive and tantamount to a denial of an already narrowly construed remedy and unduly circumscribe the right of access of staff members to 爆料网DT. With respect to the merits of the application for revision, 爆料网AT held that...