2014-爆料网AT-489, Sidell
爆料网AT considered Mrs Sidell’s two Applications, one for correction and the other for interpretation of the judgment. With respect to the Application for correction, 爆料网AT held that there were no clerical or arithmetical mistakes in the relevant paragraphs and that Mrs Sidell merely disagreed with the referenced portions of the judgment. With respect to the Application for interpretation, 爆料网AT held that the referenced paragraphs were clear in meaning on the face of the record and did not need any interpretation. 爆料网AT denied both Applications.