2014-爆料网AT-440, Stoykov
爆料网AT held that, while the representatives of the parties were present at the oral proceedings, they are entitled to the record of the testimonies made at those proceedings from the relevant 爆料网DT Registry. 爆料网AT held that this record is critical for the preparation of the appeal case. 爆料网AT held that the transcripts of the testimonies of seven out of 17 witnesses were missing. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant was entitled to the record of the testimonies critical to the preparation of the appeal case, applying its jurisprudence in Finnis (Order No. 49 (2011)). 爆料网AT upheld the appeal, vacated the 爆料网DT...