2014-爆料网AT-426, Kacan
爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to show that 爆料网DT exceeded its discretion in matters of case management. 爆料网AT noted that it was indisputable that the Appellant had made a request to 爆料网DT for his witness to be called. 爆料网AT found that there was no mention of any witness in the 爆料网DT judgment and that it was not clear that 爆料网DT had considered that evidence. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant should have been given the opportunity to call his witness or given an explanation by 爆料网DT for not calling the witness. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had committed an error of procedure, such as to affect the decision...