2014-爆料网AT-399, Egglesfield
爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in law or in fact in determining that the contested decision was unlawful. 爆料网AT held that there was no merit to the Secretary-General’s claim that the staff member could not challenge the decision not to reinstate him because he had entered a binding contract with the Administration when he signed the offer of appointment or the letter of appointment, both of which were silent about reinstatement. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly concluded that the reinstatement was not foreclosed by the absence of a reference...