2013-爆料网AT-383, Bofill
On the Appellant’s claims of discriminatory and arbitrary practices, 爆料网AT did not find that 爆料网DT committed any error of law or procedure of any factual error such as to result in a manifestly unreasonable decision and 爆料网DT’s findings demonstrated that it took cognisance of all relevant information. 爆料网AT held that there was no error by 爆料网DT in holding that it was for the High Commissioner to determine the relative importance of the criteria to use for promotion. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in law or fact when it determined that the Appellant was afforded proper consideration and in finding...