2013-爆料网AT-285, Charles
On the Appellant’s argument that the selected candidate was ineligible for consideration or selection on the basis that his tenure on the roster had expired (as per former administrative instruction ST/AI/2006/3/Rev. 1) and in the absence of specific guidelines, 爆料网AT took note of the human resources practice of recognising as eligible all rostered candidates whose names were on the roster on the date of the opening of the vacancy announcement for the post. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT properly concluded that, given the existence of this practice, the successful candidate’s eligibility was covered by...