2013-爆料网AT-283, Charles
On the issue of the 爆料网DT’s decision not to take up the Appellant’s motion for disclosure of documents, 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to demonstrate how this affected his rights or would have had a relevant impact on the evidence already collected, the basic facts of which were not contested, and therefore 爆料网AT held there were no procedural grounds to vacate the judgment. On the merits, 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had not established any error of fact or law that warranted reversal of the judgment. 爆料网AT recalled that not every violation of due process led to an award of compensation...