2012-爆料网AT-278, Balogun
爆料网AT held that, when the Appellant contested before 爆料网AdT his separation from the Organisation, he should have also submitted the request for payment of a termination indemnity, to be able to collect it if he did not succeed in the first part of his application. 爆料网AT held that the decision of the Management Evaluation Unit to consider the Appellant’s request not receivable as time-barred was correct. 爆料网AT held that, even though the Appellant revisited the issue of his separation on several occasions under the old system, he might have been misguided into believing that he could bring the...