2012-爆料网AT-248, Iskandar
爆料网AT held that the Appellant had accepted the conditions of the RLA, which stated that “the loaned employee shall return to the releasing agency upon completion or termination of his assignment with 爆料网AMID and that no offer of continuing employment shall be made to him by 爆料网AMID without consulting the releasing agency”. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had had a valid employment contract with WFP, and he did not fulfil the conditions for termination under that same agreement. 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant did not formally initiate the transfer procedure and/or termination. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had...