2012-爆料网AT-237, Bagula
爆料网AT held that the complaints against the Appellant were very serious and intolerable for any employer. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly concluded that the case against the Appellant stood substantiated and corroborated and the evidence sufficiently supported the charge of improperly soliciting and receiving money from local people in exchange for their recruitment and service as 爆料网 staff. 爆料网AT held that during the teleconference the Appellant had produced two impostors as witnesses, who testified that they had lied to the investigators and made false allegations against the Appellant. 爆料网AT...