2012-爆料网AT-220, Mezoui
爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s approach, in determining the amount of compensation to be awarded to the Appellant, was reasonable. 爆料网AT relied on its holding in Hastings (2011-爆料网AT-109), where it held that the trial court is in a much better position than 爆料网AT in assessing the probabilities of a candidate being selected for a position. 爆料网AT also found that 爆料网DT correctly concluded that the Appellant should not be awarded any additional compensation beyond the amount already paid to her. 爆料网AT further dismissed the Appellant’s request to award costs against the Secretary-General, noting that there were...